Personal injury cases can be complex, especially in Florida, where the law has shifted from pure comparative negligence to a modified comparative negligence law.
This change can significantly impact how much compensation you can recover if injured due to someone else’s negligence.
Comparative negligence determines how fault for the accident is divided among the involved parties.
If a partial finding of fault is made in a personal injury lawsuit, the plaintiff's compensation is reduced proportionately.
Florida’s comparative negligence law ensures that you’re only held responsible for your portion of the accident.
Even when the injured party bore most of the fault for the accident, they could still be awarded damages under the pure comparative negligence system.
This meant that even if you were 90% responsible for your injuries, you could still recover 10% of the compensation.
However, with Florida’s new modified comparative negligence law, you can only recover damages if you are 50% or less at fault.
If you’re found more than 50% responsible, you are barred from recovering anything.
This new modified comparative negligence law, signed into law in March 2023, drastically changes Florida's landscape for personal injury claims.
Let’s break it down. Say you're involved in a motor vehicle accident in Florida.
The court found that the other driver was 75% at fault, but you were 25% at fault for speeding.
The modified comparative negligence standard would reduce your compensation by 25%, leaving you with $75,000 if your total damages for personal injury were $100,000.
But, if you were found 51% at fault for the accident, you couldn't recover any damages.
This is the essence of Florida’s modified comparative negligence rule—your percentage of fault directly affects your personal injury claim.
Switching to a modified comparative negligence system has changed how personal injury lawyers approach cases.
It’s no longer just about proving that someone else was at fault—it’s about ensuring that you, as the plaintiff, are not partially at fault beyond the 50% threshold.
This can significantly impact your personal injury case.
You might not receive compensation if insurance companies contend you bear more than 50% of the blame.
That’s why having a skilled personal injury lawyer who understands Florida’s comparative negligence law is crucial.
Under the comparative negligence rule in Florida, both parties' actions are analyzed to determine fault for the accident.
Evidence, including witness statements, accident reports, and even medical negligence records, can establish whether the plaintiff or the defendant caused the accident.
The comparative fault system in Florida compares each person’s allotted negligence to calculate their damages entitlement.
Plaintiffs will only receive compensation commensurate with their percentage of fault thanks to this comparative fault negligence standard.
Navigating Florida’s modified comparative negligence law can be tricky, especially when the plaintiff is partially at fault.
This is why it’s essential to have an experienced personal injury lawyer by your side.
To make sure your injury claim is as strong as possible, a personal injury attorney can assist with evidence collection, insurance company negotiations, and courtroom argumentation.
At Ryan Hughes Law, we understand how the comparative negligence standard works in Florida personal injury cases.
Our goal is to protect you from being unjustly held responsible for an accident and to pursue the compensation you are entitled to.
One of the biggest hurdles in personal injury claims is dealing with insurance companies.
They often try to shift as much blame as possible onto the plaintiff to reduce liability.
Under the modified comparative negligence standard, they won't have to pay anything if they can prove you were more than 50% at fault.
At Ryan Hughes Law, we ensure that doesn’t happen.
Our legal team will work to minimize your percentage of fault and ensure that insurance companies don’t take advantage of the new law.
The modified comparative negligence rule applies to wrongful death claims and personal injury lawsuits in Florida.
If a loved one was killed in a pedestrian accident, for example, the court will assess whether the plaintiff was partially at fault.
If the deceased were found to be more than 50% responsible for the accident, the family would not be able to recover any damages.
However, in most personal injury or wrongful death claims, it’s rare for the plaintiff to bear the majority of the blame.
Still, the comparative negligence standard remains a powerful tool for insurance companies trying to reduce payouts.
The U.S. has different types of comparative negligence, and each state follows its rules.
Before it adopted the pure comparative negligence rule, Florida permitted injured parties to obtain compensation even when they bore most of the blame.
However, the new modified comparative negligence law rules have changed, and your ability to recover damages is more restricted.
In contrast, some states follow a harsher contributory negligence standard, where even 1% fault bars the plaintiff from recovering anything.
Florida’s modified comparative negligence system is more forgiving but requires the plaintiff to be less than 51% responsible.
If you’ve been injured in an accident in Florida and are facing a personal injury claim under the modified comparative negligence law, don’t wait.
Contact us right away to make an appointment for a free consultation with an experienced personal injury lawyer who is versed in Florida's comparative negligence laws.
Contributory negligence is an older, stricter rule under which a plaintiff who is even 1% at fault cannot recover damages. Under Florida's comparative negligence law, plaintiffs may obtain damages even in cases where they bear some of the blame; however, the amount of damages they may receive will be diminished in proportion to their degree of fault. This comparative fault system is generally considered fairer and is used in most states, including Florida.
Being 99 percent at fault does not automatically bar a plaintiff from recovering damages because pure comparative negligence is the standard applied in Florida. However, the amount of damages that can be recovered will be significantly reduced. Some states use modified comparative negligence, which bars recovery if the plaintiff is 50% or 51% at fault. Other states still use contributory negligence, which bars recovery if the plaintiff is slightly at fault.
Under Florida's comparative negligence statute, you may be able to recover damages for your injuries even if you had some part of the fault for the accident. You can receive compensation; however, the amount you are entitled to will be diminished by the jury's or court's assessment of your relative fault.
Fault in a Florida personal injury case is determined by examining all evidence of the accident, including police reports, witness statements, expert testimony, and physical evidence. The judge or jury will consider this evidence and assign a percentage of fault to each party involved. This determination is crucial in applying the comparative negligence rule.
Even if a plaintiff bears only 99% of the blame for their injuries, they are entitled to damages under Florida's pure comparative negligence system. The court or jury determines the percentage of fault for each party involved, and that percentage then reduces the plaintiff's award. This system allocates responsibility fairly among all parties involved in the accident.
Copyright © 2022 Hughes Law. All rights reserved
